This web site was designed with web standards and is best viewed with current web browsers. This note is visible to you because you are using an outdated web browser that does not support web standards. If you use Netscape or Internet Explorer, we recommend at least Netscape 6 for Windows and Mac, Internet Explorer 6 for Windows, and Internet Explorer 5 for Mac. Otherwise, you will see the content this web site without its graphic design.

 

Home

News

Job Opportunities

Prayer Requests

Deaths

Newsletters

Academy Meetings

Seminars

Member Papers

About NAAL

Contact Us

Officers

Membership

Visitors

Awards

Search

Ritual Theory and Performance
2005 Louisville, Kentucky

2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002


Convener 2005

Tom Splain, S.J. (professor of cultural anthropology, The Gregorian University, Rome)

Seminar Participants 2005

Mary Fran Fleischaker, Cliff Guthrie, David Hogue, Richard McCall, Troy Messenger, Gerard Pottebaum, Thomas Quartier, Tom Splain, Susan White

Visitors:  David Buley, Ken Hull, Martin Modéus

Seminar Report 2005

Thomas Quartier started us off by presenting the results of an empirical study that he and a team at Nijmegen University had conducted on beliefs about the past and future expressed by participants who attended ten Roman Catholic funeral rites in the Netherlands.  The research team attended the liturgies between February and August 2002.  Initially, the pastor gave questionnaires to participants.  Later, members of the research team also met with the mourners.  539 questionnaires were distributed. 229 were returned for a response rate of 40%.  The purpose was to ascertain beliefs about the past and future of the deceased and look for correlation of these beliefs with the Roman Rite.

The act of remembering takes place in the mind of individuals but it cannot be understood without a collective actor.  The corporate body continues to exist when an individual ceases to be part of that body.  The liturgy has both an anamnetic and an epicletic nature.  Within this, the researchers targeted four dimensions for their investigation: communicative-liturgical remembrance and communicative-liturgical hope, cultural-liturgical remembrance and cultural-liturgical hope.  In the communicative-liturgical remembrance and the communicative-liturgical hope, the individual characteristics of the deceased are remembered and made present.  (There may or may not be an anticipated future.)   Cultural-liturgical remembrance and hope pivots on understandings of salvation and resurrection.

Conceptualization of Liturgical Remembrance and Hope

 

Liturgical Remembrance

Liturgical Hope

Cultural

 

 

Salvation

God’s salvation during the life of the deceased

God’s salvation for the deceased in the future

Resurrection

Death and resurrection of Jesus for the deceased

Resurrection of the deceased with Jesus Christ in the future

Communicative

 

 

Individual

Intrinsic value of the deceased in his or her life

Meaning in the future in what he or she leaves behind

Social

Meaning for others of the deceased during his or her life

Meaning in the future in what he or she leaves behind